February 09, 2019

 

"It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error, it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error."  American Communications Association v. Douds, 339 U.S. 332, 442 (1950).

   Chief Justice Howell Heflin and his clerk, now Senator Doug Jones, made it "lawful to evade" Alabama State Law and the Uniform Bonding Code (UBC), which requires all public servants to file with the Secretary of State a “faithful performance bond”. No one can hold public office unless he has on file an oath of office, a payment and a performance bond and his commission, which is either by election or appointment.

     Persons without proper Oaths do not and cannot have proper Bonds  OR satisfy the necessary requirements to “hold” a bona fide “Office”, by ‘commission’, “election”, or “appointment”.

     In short, an ‘Officer’ or “Office Holder” cannot but ‘occupy’ the office under false and misleading pretense, misrepresentation, and FRAUD, which strips the ‘individual’ of ‘law authority’ and ‘immunity’ under well-seasoned law of the land and sea.

     Brutum fulmen!!　 　Bonds that are attached to such juristic ‘persons’ are subject to claim and lien, after “adequate assurance of due performance” has been found lacking pursuant to U.C.C. 2-619.

     A proper Oath and Bond are but two of the three primary “poles” of “Office” [Oath, Bond, Commission].　 One cannot act upon being ‘duly appointed’ or ‘duly elected’ or ‘duly commissioned’ simply by incorporation and corporate administrative process.

     A government official, officer or clerk who is not bonded or who loses his bond, shall be held financially responsible for his own actions. He shall have, as the only support for his own authority, the pledge of his own personal property, real and movable, to satisfy the damages which he causes to citizens by the exercise of that authority.

How can one call another a "criminal" when he himself does not respect the RULE OF LAW?

January 21, 2019

 

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall, Humpty Dumpty had a great fall; Threescore men and threescore more, couldn’t place Humpty Dumpty as he was before.

      Kansas Supreme Court ruling in Landmark National Bank v. Kesler, 2009 LEXIS 834, the court held that a nominee company called MERS has no right or standing to bring an action for foreclosure. Nobody has standing to foreclose. There are two sides to any contract. When both sides default, the contract is unenforceable.

     The bank defaulted when it abandoned its trust responsibilities by settling the promissory note through changing the debt to a stock without disclosure to the debtor. The debt so treated cannot be enforced unless the debtor is conned into allowing the “color of law” to proceed.

Quotes from the case:

     The real parties in interest concealed behind MERS have been made so faceless, however, that there is now no party with standing to foreclose. The Kansas Supreme Court stated that MERS’ relationship “is more akin to that of a straw man than to a party possessing all the rights given a buyer.” The court opined:

     “By statute, assignment of the mortgage carries with it the assignment of the debt. . . . Indeed, in the event that a mortgage loan somehow separates interests of the note and the deed of trust, with the deed of trust lying with some independent entity, the mortgage may become unenforceable. The practical effect of splitting the deed of trust from the promissory note is to make it impossible for the holder of the note to foreclose, unless the holder of the deed of trust is the agent of the holder of the note. Without the agency relationship, the person holding only the note lacks the power to foreclose in the event of default. The person holding only the deed of trust will never experience default because only the holder of the note is entitled to payment of the underlying obligation. The mortgage loan becomes ineffectual when the note holder did not also hold the deed of trust.” [Citations omitted; emphasis added.]

     “The sole goal of the [bailout schemes] is to prevent owners of mortgage-backed securities, many of them foreigners, from suing U.S. banks and forcing them to buy back worthless mortgage securities at face value – right now almost 10 times their market worth. The ticking time bomb in the U.S. banking system is not resetting subprime mortgage rates. The real problem is the contractual ability of investors in mortgage bonds to require banks to buy back the loans at face value if there was fraud in the origination process.

     “. . . The catastrophic consequences of bond investors forcing originators to buy back loans at face value are beyond the current media discussion. The loans at issue dwarf the capital available at the largest U.S. banks combined, and investor lawsuits would raise stunning liability sufficient to cause even the largest U.S. banks to fail, resulting in massive taxpayer-funded bailouts of Fannie and Freddie, and even FDIC . . . .

     “What would be prudent and logical is for the banks that sold this toxic waste to buy it back and for a lot of people to go to prison. If they knew about the fraud, they should have to buy the bonds back.”

   Humpty Dumpty cannot not be made whole, again. A Bail-Out is the application of make-up on the face of a corpse. Two million foreclosures this year will expose the blood dropping from the hands of the three branches of government. It must be set right. “Be sure your sins will find you out.”

December 08, 2018

 

One’s private life is his alone, even President Trump. The public cannot interfere.

Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43(1906)

Hale v. Henkel was decided by the united States Supreme Court in 1906. The opinion of the court states, in part:

     Page 201 U. S. 44 "There is a clear distinction between an individual and a corporation, and the latter, being a creature of the State, has not the constitutional right to refuse to submit its books and papers for an examination at the suit of the State;"

     Page 201 U. S. 74 "The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the State or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to criminate him. He owes no such duty to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights."

     Hale v. Henkel is binding on all the courts of the United States of America until another Supreme Court case says it is not. No other Supreme Court case has ever overturned Hale v. Henkel.

     None of the various issues of Hale v. Henkel have ever been overruled.

Since 1906, Hale v. Henkel has been cited by the Federal and State Appellate Court systems over 1,600 times! In nearly every instance when a case is cited, it has an impact on precedent authority of the cited case.

     Compared with other previously decided Supreme Court cases, no other case has surpassed Hale v. Henkel in the number of times it has been cited by the courts.

     "Stare Decisis" is the term to use in an Affidavit as a "Belligerent Claimant at Law" to rebut an alleged frivolous assertion. You may also use Article 4, Section 1,"judicial proceedings" & Section 2 to bolster instructions to the court, pursuant to the Mandatory Judicial Notice of the Federal Rules of Evidence 201-d. The court cannot overlook the 1600 citations wherein Hale v. Henkel has been used to assert the adherence to established precedents and not to disturb or unsettle the same. This is supported by one of the bedrock principles of our legal system is “stare decisis et non quieta movere” which, according to Black’s Law Dictionary, means “[t]o adhere to precedent and not to unsettle things which are established”. Found in Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition (1979), page 1261, citing Ballard County v. Kentucky County Debt Commission, 290 Ky. 770. (1942), 162 S.W.2d 771, 773. et al.

October 30, 2018

 

If an officer of the court causes dishonor, their bond must be forfeited to cure their dishonor.

Any officer of the court who forfeits their bond loses their job.

Next » Alabama Code Title 36. Public Officers and Employees § 36-5-2

In all cases, official bonds must be filed in the proper office within 40 days after the declaration of election or after the appointment to office, except bonds of tax assessors and tax collectors which shall be filed on or before September 1 next after their election or appointment.

Next » Alabama Code Title 36. Public Officers and Employees § 36-5-1

The official bond of every state official, agent or employee, except the bond of the Secretary of State, must be filed in the office of the Secretary of State and recorded in a fair hand or by printing the same or by the use of a typewriter or other writing or printing or photostatic machine, word for word in a well-bound book or books and indexed in alphabetical order according to the title of the office, and all of said bonds shall remain on file and in the custody of the Secretary of State, except the bond of the Secretary of State, which shall be filed, recorded and remain in the custody of the Auditor. (SOS Merrill has no bond.)

Section 36-5-15

Failure of officer to give bond within prescribed time vacates office; certification of failure to file bond to appointing power and filling of vacancy.

If any officer required by law to give bond fails to file the same within the time fixed by law, he vacates his office. In such case, it is the duty of the officer in whose office such bond is required to be filed at once to certify such failure to the appointing power, and the vacancy must be filled as in other cases.

5.4 - bonding of judges

A judge shall lose his bonding shall not be bonded, and shall be deemed

Un-bondable; (1) if he fails to protect the U.S. Constitutionally guaranteed remedies of due process and the equal protection of the laws of any citizen appearing in his court of law or of any citizen appearing in any court of the county in which he works whose case may come to his attention by any means.

Don't vote for any public official who has no bond on file  or is unable to post a bond..

September 03, 2018

 

WHAT WERE WE THINKING?

FIVE WHO SHAPED MAN’S THOUGHTS

For as he thinketh in his heart so is he: Proverbs 23:7 (KJV)

     The first was a man named George Frederick HEGEL. He was a philosopher who lived in the 1820s.

     Hegelianism is the philosophy of G. W. F. Hegel which can be summed up by the dictum that "the rational alone is real", which means that all reality is capable of being expressed in rational categories. His goal was to reduce reality to a more synthetic unity within the system of absolute idealism.

     For over 1500 years people had accepted without question the fact of MORAL ABSOLUTES that right was right and wrong was wrong. The moral absolutes were universal everywhere, murder was thought to be wrong, everywhere adultery was thought to be wrong, and if it were not thought to be wrong, it was only an aberration, a departure from what is normal, usual, or expected, typically one that is unwelcome.

     The consensus was that there is a fixed standard of right and wrong. Hegel rejected MORAL ABSOLUTES. Hegel had what he called a dialectic theory. A Dialectic System is just simply a system of argument. He had a reasoned argument, a dialectic theory. What was his dialectic theory?

     Briefly, Hegel’s view is that all of history comprises thesis, antithesis and synthesis. Thesis is an idea proposition that people believe to be true and they hold that idea until somebody comes along with an opposing idea, an anti-thesis. Thesis and antithesis begin to battle back and forth until both give a little and they meet somewhere in the middle agreeing to a synthesis, which is a thesis/antithesis coming together for the synthesis that becomes the new thesis.

     The synthesis then becomes the new accepted model for truth. Hegel said therefore there are no MORAL ABSOLUTES. Hegel was not talking about biological evolution, he was talking about philosophical and social evolution. Society is always in a flux, it's always moving and there is no fixed standard of right and wrong.

     Even today in our high schools, few students believe that there is a fixed standard of right and wrong?

     American college students might say, “What is right for you may not be right for me.”

     Hegel said that ideas come under the heading of the survival of the strongest or fittest. The strongest surviving idea makes for history being evolutionary. There can be no absolutes.

     In 1830 another German philosopher named Ludwig Feuerbach. Feuerbach also reasoned that if there are no absolutes, Hegel would be right. Then there can be no God because if there is a God and that God would have absolute truth.

Feuerbach said man creates the idea of God, that man is not made in the image of God, but God is in the imagination of man. All is a moral flux. The absence of an absolutes causes a deep insecurity in the heart and mind of man.

     So, if Feuerbach said that God is created in the imagination of man and that man just simply invents God. He pompously stated, “Christianity has in fact long vanished not only from reason but from the life of mankind. It is nothing more than a fixed idea.” His belief is called humanism. Humanism sounds much like humanitarianism but there is a vast difference between humanism and humanitarianism. Humanitarianism means we love one another, we care for one another and we love the human species and that God has made man. Humanism makes man the center, the circumference, the sum of everything, and man has no room for God.

     Though a fine sounding name, it is but atheism simply just wearing another attire. First came Hegel, the Hegelian philosophy and then right after that you have Feuerbach who builds upon Hegel.

So, the third person whose writings still impact us today is the writings of Karl Marx.

     Karl Marx built on the work of Hegel and Feuerbach. Marx said, “Now if this is true, if there are no absolutes, therefore, there is no God, then what is the future and the purpose of mankind?

     Where are we going because of that thinking? Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto in 1848. He took the no God of Hegel's dialectic argument. He called it Dialectical Materialism, which is another word for Communism. He believed that capitalism, the right to own property and the right to be productive for yourself, was evil. He said those beliefs is the thesis. The antithesis is the desire for equity and fairness in the hearts and minds of the working people.

     He said if you take that thesis and that antithesis you will come to a synthesis which will be Socialism or Communism. That is Marxism. Hegelian philosophy and the ideas of Feuerbach put together because Communism.

     Communism is godless and is not just another form of an economy. Communism is unspeakably immoral. It does not recognize the worth, the dignity of the individual. The individual is nothing. So, Marx said that the way to set all this in motion is by a revolution. He said that it does not matter if there is suffering.

     He believed that there must be violent change, much like the mandatory removal of a foreign body within the existing system. The foreign body removal will accelerate its death.

     So, millions and millions and millions were put to death under godless communism executed because in the belief that there is no God.

     If there is no God, there is no fixed standard of right and wrong. We as human beings are left with materialism. What must then be done is to somehow bring in a humanist’s godless utopia.

     Revolution was necessary. Marx said that the suffering and the sacrifice of violent change constitutes the price that mankind must pay to have any essential progress at all.

     So, is communism itself dying? It is not dead in red China.

   Where is it found to be most vibrant? In the Universities of America today, should the Russians want to rid itself of the old textbooks, it is the University, we are of the opinion, would buy the is Marxism Leninism that is infecting and affecting the American’s life today. The main stream media spreads the propaganda.

     The fourth man that has skewed the worldview is Charles Darwin.

     Charles Darwin wrote the Origin of the Species in 1859 and The Dissent of man in 1871. He concluded that man is the product of evolution.

     If there is no God, there can be no fixed standard of right and wrong. If there is no God, then how do we get here? How do we explain our existence?

     Well, evolution is not a science. It is philosophy.

     It is the next best guess of the mind that cannot accept divine creation. So, wrote that we ourselves are the product of mere chance. We, as human beings cannot escape the evolutionary web another philosopher later described what Darwin taught to be “a single argument”. The mystery of the universe is explained, the deity is annulled, and a new era of infinite knowledge is ushered in. From that time on, man has been endeavoring to make a monkey of himself, thanks to Charles Darwin and those who believe him.

     Now the fifth of these five men that impact our thought today is a man named Sigmund Freud.

     Sigmund Freud lived from 1856 to 1939. He was the one who put the final bow on the whole thing, put the final touches to the evolutionary model.

     Now Feuerbach said that we created the idea of God because of the insecurities that Hegel brought about by saying there are no absolutes. Freud said when we get the idea of God, whatever kind of God conjured up are an idea of God that comes to us from our childhood father.

     We conceive of God like we would conceive of our childhood father, when we were children.

     Freud was the father of psychoanalysis. He taught that mankind is motivated chiefly by pleasure, specifically by sexual pleasure and eroticism. To Freud almost everything begins and ends with sex and so he felt that if mankind is repressed by society in his erotic or hurt erotic urges other erotic urges people up failed to be allowed to fulfill their sexual and erotic desires they may get a neurosis.

   Is the fruit of his thinking the reason there is such an increase in the perversion, the filth, and the debauchery commonplace society today?

     Could it be that the roots are the widespread extreme permissiveness that came out of Freudian psychology? and you see it in raising children. We are told today not to repress children. After all you don't want warp the little thing. My dad warped me. You don’t want to warp him. If an offspring wants to cut the leg off the dining room table, you keep the saw sharp, so it won't frustrate the Kid. That is the idea that we have today.

History has declared what happened when these five men brought forth these philosophies. It took less than a century for them to come into fruition.

     In 1924 a man who was a student of Hegel and Feuerbach and a student of Karl Marx, Adolf Hitler.

     He thought he developed a better idea than Marx's. His idea was Nazism.

     So, he wrote Mein Kampf. Here are some quotes.

     He who would live must fight. He who doesn't wish to fight in this world, where permanent struggle is the law of life, has not the right to exist.

     If Nature does not wish that weaker individuals should mate with the stronger, she wishes even less that a superior race should intermingle with an inferior one; because in such a case all her efforts, throughout hundreds of thousands of years, to establish an evolutionary higher stage of being, may thus be rendered futile.

     He who wants to live should fight, therefore, and he who does not want to battle in this world of eternal struggle does not deserve to be alive.

     Blood mixture and the resultant drop in the racial level is the sole cause of the dying out of old cultures; for men do not perish as a result of lost wars, but by the loss of that force of resistance which is contained only in pure blood. All who are not of good race in this world are chaff.

     As with the survival of the fittest with Charles Darwin, there is no desire in nature for the mating of the weaker and stronger. Individuals even less, as nature does not favor the blending of a higher and lower races.

     Even if you consider his thought hard to imagine, these thoughts led to the gassed showers and gas ovens for cremation.

     What differs in the abortion business in America today? Is it not a grizzly business today of taking who are the weakest of all and because they are weak and because they cannot defend themselves, they can be liquidated. Hitler's argument for the extermination of Jews law, he reclassified them as nonpersons. Are we doing to the little babies today we are reclassifying them as nonpersons.

     Many claim to personally be against the cremation of human beings but what one does in his own personal gas chambers his business time. I believe in choice and the idea of survival of the strongest.

     These ideas have been around for a long time. Departure from MORAL ABSOLUTES is to “sow the wind” before the reaping of the whirlwind.

Ephesians in the Bible

¹² For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

¹³ Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.

¹⁴ Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;

¹⁵ And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace;

¹⁶ Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.

¹⁷ And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:

¹⁸ Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints;

¹⁹ And for me, that utterance may be given unto me, that I may open my mouth boldly, to make known the mystery of the gospel,

     The weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty through God to the pulling down strongholds and God has given us teaching them authority Jesus said behold I give you authority over all the power of the enemy. The one thing that they do not have his truth point A the other thing they don't have they don't have the Holy Spirit to what we need to do is to take the word of truth and the spirit of truth and hold up the Christ of truth we need to get on the boat with both feet today is a sure we need to know who we are what we believe and why we believe and I tell you friend that we don't have to be ashamed of what we believe they are good answers to these things in the Bible says we're to be ready always to give an answer to those who ask us of these things and I am convinced is not a lot wrong in America that could not be changed radically and quickly if we have a generation of preachers across this land would stand in the pulpits of God anointed with the Holy Spirit and a heart full of love from a pure life who would preach and teach us saith the Lord let it start in my heart let it start in your heart let it start in church less than up and speak up while God gives us a voice a man)

August 23, 2018

 

NOTICE OF FATAL DEFECT AND DEMAND FOR

CANCELLATION OF ALLEGED FORECLOSURE SALE

      This is a response notice to a fatally defective LEGAL NOTICE published in the Southern Star January 9, 16, 23, 2013 numbered AL-90001116-12 by William G. Berry, Esq. for WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC.

      COMES NOW, Haywood Jackson Mizell and Alice Faye Mizell, the affiants, after first being duly sworn who are of lawful age competent to handle all our private affairs, and of sound minds, living, well, breathing, natural born, a free man and a free woman living on the soil, two of the People Sui Juris having no legal disability, with and claiming all of his and her unlimited, inherent, unalienable, God given Rights and who are competent to testify to the facts set forth below and are voluntarily relating the following first-hand knowledge of such facts, hereby states that such facts are true, correct, and complete and are not intended to mislead and are telling the truth signed under the penalty of perjury.

    Demand is hereby made for cancellation of an illegal foreclosure. Notice is hereby given of intent to convene a grand jury with full investigative powers under a writ of inquiry for criminal matters including but not limited to uttering of forged documents and simulation of legal process.

      No venue and jurisdiction have been alleged by William G. Berry. Said notice contains no constitutional or statutory authority cited. Haywood Jackson Mizell and Alice Faye Mizell have never knowingly, willingly, voluntarily or intentionally consented to any equitable conversion of persons, property, papers, or effects, or knowingly, willingly, voluntarily or intentionally granted license for use of such to Probate Judge Sharon Michalic, Sheriff Wally Olson or attorney William G. Berry.

      No venue or jurisdiction has been identified either in common law or in civil law in said notice, nor is there a statement or averment regarding the office of the probate and whether it is operating in a constitutional capacity as judge under general law powers or whether the office is acting as Chancellor under statutory commission.

     Notice is hereby given of the definition of INSINUATION. In the civil law, THE TRANSCRIPTION OF AN ACT ON THE PUBLIC REGISTRY LIKE OUR RECORDING OF DEEDS. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY IN ANY OTHER ALIENATION BUT THAT APPROPIATED TO THE PURPOSE OF DONATION. Inst. 2,7,2.

     NOTICE IS GIVEN OF THE CONTINUATION OF A WILL. In the civil law, the first production of a will, or leaving it with the registrar, in order to its probate. Cowell; Blount. Black’s law dictionary2^nd.

     Haywood Jackson Mizell and Alice Faye Mizell hereby declare that we never intended to register a will in probate under civil law and never have we alienated ourselves from the property and given the property as a donation. Haywood Jackson Mizell and Alice Faye Mizell have never knowingly, willingly, voluntarily or intentionally donated our property to or for the use of a third party.

     We do not allow any further action. The foreclosure must be cancelled until you inform us as to how a mortgage document can be converted to a will. Never at any time in our life did we intend to create a will to be registered in the public domain in the probate office.

     Haywood Jackson Mizell and Alice Faye Mizell have never knowingly, willingly, voluntarily or intentionally domiciled our person, property, papers or effects in any foreign third-party jurisdiction or granted permission for our private signatures to be placed into commercial trade or for the use by any third party. There is no record of such action in the granting of such consent. You are hereby noticed that such activity constitutes civil and criminal trespass, civil and criminal theft, forgery, breach of peace which all are foundational grounds for contempt of the duties of public officials giving rise to summary process and attachment of trespassers private property.

      The said notice did not identify the venue and the jurisdiction, and we do not allow said action to proceed any further until we obtain the source of authority.

     We do not stipulate to any statements made in the said notice and do not acquiesce by silence. No reasonable response can be generated from a fatally defective publication and insufficient notice.   We do not agree to any statements made in the said notice. Furthermore, we do not consent to any attempt to obtain our acquiescence, consent or our ratification of commencement through said notice.

     NOTICE OF FATAL DEFECT AND DEMAND FOR CANCELLATION OF ALLEGED FORECLOSURE SALE was executed this day January 14^th, 2013 A.D. at arm’s length and without the UNITED STATES.

August 06, 2018

 

Yesterday, I viewed Death of a Nation. Illustrated was the immense importance of individual faithfulness.

     The movie displayed morally glorious results reached by individual faithfulness to the true God. There were times when America’s national glory was gone; their city and churches in ruins.

     It is in the Book of Daniel that we see three worthies who refused to worship the golden image. They dared to face the wrath of the king, to withstand the universal voice of the empire, yea, to meet the fiery furnace itself, rather than disobey. They could surrender life, but they could not surrender the truth of God. It is a sin to have respect to persons.

     And what was the result? A splendid victory! They walked through the furnace with the Son of God and were called forth from the furnace as witnesses and servants of the Most High God. Glorious privilege! Wondrous dignity! And all the simple result of obedience. Had they gone with the crowd and bowed the head in worship to the national god, in order to escape the dreadful furnace, see what they would have lost!

     But, blessed be God, they were enabled to stand fast in the confession of the grand foundation truth of the unity of the Godhead — that truth which had been trampled under foot amid the splendors of Solomon's reign; and the record of their faithfulness has been penned for us by the Holy Spirit, in order to encourage us to tread, with firm step, the path of individual devotedness, in the face of a God-hating, Christ-rejecting world, and in the face of a truth-neglecting Christendom.

     It is impossible to read the narrative and not have our whole renewed being stirred up and drawn out in earnest desire for more deep-toned personal devotedness to Christ and His precious cause.

June 22, 2018

 

You, the Homeowner, will:
1. Struggle and work to pay all your mortgage payments thinking you are buying a home.
2. In fifteen (15) or thirty (30), you will be expecting to receive the Original Promissory Note marked "Paid In Full" and a clear and perfectible Deed after you make your last mortgage payment.
3. You will receive Neither since the Deed of Trust was destroyed many years before and you will have NO IDEA who owns the Promissory Note, if it even still exists, and therefore, you will not know who to contact to attempt to obtain the Non-Existent Promissory Note.
4. The Original Mortgage Company you THOUGHT you were dealing with has long since gone out of business, likely through Bankruptcy.
5. Your County Recorder's Office will have been rendered ineffective and useless due to their Filing Records History having been destroyed by the RICO Fraud Enterprise.
6. You will be incapable of Legally proving a perfectible and enforceable Chain of Title.
7. You will likely have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on a property to which you are emotionally attached and for which you, at that future time, will be unable to prove a clear, perfectible and total Chain of Title ownership.
8. You will still be held liable for all Property Taxes due on a Property that you do not Legally Own.
9. Selling the Property will become all but impossible since you will be unable to Legally and Ethically pass clear Title of Ownership to a new buyer.
10. You will be at a later stage in life when the last thing you will want to confront is a long, expensive and stressful legal Battle to attempt to perfect your Legal relationship to the property.
11. The Records are Destroyed and whomever you attempt to confront can simply say "We are the 100th organization involved in your property and we never got complete records when we paid cents on the dollar for your property, so we can't help you."
12. You will then realize that you have been and, continue to be, a RENTER who has unknowingly been given the privilege of paying all maintenance, improvement, insurance and Tax expenses on a property you DO NOT OWN. See Title 42 Peonage Abolished
13. At this point, your official legal classification is that of an Involuntarily Indentured Servant.
14. Indentured Servitude is illegal in this Country under Federal Law.
15. Putting off and ignoring the problem will only bring an ever-worsening degree of harm, heartache and financial ruin upon you and your loved ones as each year passes.
16. This writer will not stand quietly by and wake up in thirty (30) years to fight this fight when I am too old to do so.
17. If we, as Americans, do not see a dramatic directional change in the behavior of the U. S. Government in their desire, as proven ONLY by their Actions, to stop this Fraud, hold the perpetrators accountable, legally repair, on a Federal Court level, the millions of broken and destroyed Chains of Title and protect innocent Homeowner victims, this writer will file a Civil RICO Fraud Lawsuit and will go to the mat, and to the U. S. Supreme Court, if necessary and possible, to disclose and fight this LARGEST RICO FRAUD IN RECORDED HISTORY.
18. It is Your Life and Your Family's Welfare: WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO?
19. WE CANNOT CONTINUE TO PASS THE BUCK, SIT ON THE SIDELINES AND EXPECT SOMEONE ELSE TO DO THAT WHICH WE SHOULD BE DOING NOW TO STOP THIS FRAUD.